Kamala Harris' ex-lover, Montel Williams, appeared on CNN last night where he shared his perspective on Charlie Kirk's killer, Tyler Robinson.

"There are people trying to pigeonhole this as a leftist thing and a right thing" said Montel. "I think this was motived emotionally."

"There are people trying to pigeonhole this as a leftist thing and a right thing. And what we're really talking about… we're talking about a love-torn child.. Somebody was disparaging the person that he loved."

Leftists and the mainstream media have spent the last week trying to paint this assassination as anything but political. First, they said that he was conservative and MAGA, but after his activism and love-life were exposed, they've changed their approach.

Now the media is saying that the shooter acted out of "love" — further distancing this shooter from leftist ideology.

Montel Williams claims that the shooter "tried to defend his significant other," the trans women he was reportedly dating. According to Williams, the shooter took Kirk's remarks about trans people personally—and therefore in some twisted act of love Robinson shot Kirk.

It's a stretch.

How can Montel even make a distinction between political motivation and emotional? If you are upset about a difference in political opinion and act on that out of anger or hate, is that not still political?

Everyone knows that leftists get too emotional about politics. That's one of the main problems when it comes to debate. Left wing politics is ruled by emotions—just try to tell them abortion is murder or refugees should go home.

What Montel is really communicating to us, is that leftists cannot handle disparaging comments, they have to be accepted by everyone at all times regardless of their lifestyle.